I'm back: Making sense of a German familienbuch

I'm back! It's been a busy, sometimes insane, several years since my last blog entry here. I'm still teaching in the Genealogy Studies Program at Boston University's Center for Professional Education, but I'm also focusing on completing and writing up research on my own ancestors.

One of my current projects is documenting the parents of my immigrant great-great-grandfather Jacob Knieper of Illerich, Germany, and Maple Grove Township in Saginaw County, Michigan. Most online trees assign the wrong parents to Jacob, so I decided to set the record straight. I'll be writing more about that in future entries here, so watch this space. 😉

Illerich is one of a cluster of villages set back from the Moselle River by maybe a couple of miles. The records of the Catholic churches there have been microfilmed and now are digitized and can be viewed on FamilySearch.org; search the site's catalog by town name to view them. In addition to parish records, there's a register of families, a familienbuch, compiled from records of Illerich and some of the other villages. This is the first time I've had the pleasure of drawing on this type of resource for my own family's history.

As I first started working in the familienbuch, I made myself a reference sheet (by the way, if your German is better than mine and you see any errors in my labels here, let me know!): 

 

Family of Jakob Krämer and A[nna] Maria Ürschfeld of Illerich, my 4 x great-grandparents

Source: Pfarrkirche St. Vinzenz (Saint Vincent Catholic Parish, Illerich, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany), “Familien-Buch der Pfarrei Illerich beginnend mit dem Jahre 1613,” page 193, family of Jakob Krämer and A[nna] Maria Ürschfeld; FHL microfilm 583680; image viewed 13 Dec. 2017 on https://www.familysearch.org/, access via Search > Catalog, search by microfilm number; image 103.

Sometimes my projects end up on a back burner for a while, and reference sheets ("cheat sheets") save me time when I pick up the work again.

Because the information in this familienbuch is compiled from other sources, I hunt down the original entries (for example, baptismal records) and double-check names and dates and places and relationships. Even careful record-keepers can get confused when there are multiple people of about the same age with the same name.

The familienbuch entry above notes that Jacob and Anna Maria married on 31 October 1797. Here's the entry in the Illerich Roman Catholic parish marriage records. Spelling of their surnames varies in the records!

 

Source: Pfarrkirche St. Vinzenz (Saint Vincent Catholic Parish, Illerich, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany), marriage register 1848–1926, p. 286, Jacobus Kremer and Anna Maria Urschfeld; FHL microfilm 583680; image viewed 23 Dec. 2017 on https://www.familysearch.org/, access via Search > Catalog, search by microfilm number; image 152.

 

 

Thank you, F. Warren Bittner

As a genealogist, it’s frustrating to me that apparently all my ancestral lines lead back to European peasants—records are scarce and entries in history books, even local history, uncommon. Acknowledgement and documentation of an ordinary life of hardship doesn’t often make it into print for descendants to discover and exclaim, “here’s my ancestor, and what he did and how he lived.”

For this reason, I was thrilled to read F. Warren Bittner’s recent article, a winner of the 2011 Family History Writing Contest, “Without Land, Occupation, Rights, or Marriage Privilege: The Büttner Family from Bavaria to New York.”^⁠1 Bittner does an outstanding job of mining records and applying a knowledge of local social history and laws to those records, resulting in an enhanced and documented picture of one Bavarian family’s life in poverty.

Bittner chooses the Büttner men’s efforts to marry as his springboard for examining property, occupations, and rights of village residency. Despite couples’ attempts to legally wed, restrictions put in place by village, guild, and district authorities resulted in illegitimate children; towns disputed each other over which must take responsibility and allow the family group to settle within the community. Repeatedly members of the Büttner family attempted to break down barriers to a marginally better life.

In the course of the article Bittner discusses sexual mores, the amount of land needed to support a family, the social status of weavers, a change in laws and courts in the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars, the disadvantage of being bound to the land and the far greater disadvantage of being landless. He draws on tenancy records, maps, land files, marriage hearings, military papers, and the usual church registers in the course of his research. Footnotes refer to what appears to be a definitive library of eighteenth and nineteenth century Bavarian social history, including titles such as Property, Production, and Family in Neckarhausen: 1780-1870; and German Home Towns: Community, State, and General Estate, 1648-1871; and The Village in Court: Arson, Infanticide, and Poaching in the Court Records of Upper Bavaria, 1848-1910; and “Village Spinning Bees: Sexual Culture and Free Time among Rural Youth in Early Modern Germany.”^⁠2 The result is a broad picture of the miserable social and legal conditions in which the Büttners struggled to exist. Bittner sums up their situation well when he writes, “Leonhard and Margaretha lived in a different world in the same villages as their neighbors with higher status.”^⁠3 Bittner shows us that world.

There are two take-aways from this article: one, it is possible to learn—and say—much more about those who lived “at the bottom of the village hierarchy”;^⁠4 and two, it takes a good deal of work. The pay-off however is huge, for both the subjects’ descendants and others researching the geographical area. This article is a model, an inspiration, and a bench-mark. Thank you, F. Warren Bittner, for showing us so thoroughly and so elegantly that it is indeed possible to document, describe, and honor the lives of our peasant ancestors.

¹ F. Warren Bittner, “Without Land, Occupation, Rights, or Marriage Privilege: The Bütnner Family from Bavaria to New York,” National Genealogical Society Quarterly 100 (September 2012): 165-187.

² I marked twenty-eight of the titles he refers to with the notations “read” or “look up”; I have Bavarian lines of my own to research!

³ Bittner, “The Büttner Family from Bavaria to New York,” 187.

⁴ Bittner, “The Büttner Family from Bavaria to New York,” 169.

Daily life in colonial New England

Do you ever discover by chance a book so good that you’re actually miffed that no one had ever brought it to your attention? Do you find yourself checking the publication date and exclaiming to an empty room (or a stranger sitting next to you on the subway), “This came out several years ago, for pete’s sake—how come I haven’t heard about it??” That was my reaction a few months ago after stumbling across Jerald E. Brown’s The Years of the Life of Samuel Lane, 1718-1806: A New Hampshire Man and His World^⁠1 in a local indie book store.

Samuel Lane—tanner, shoemaker, family man, property owner, surveyor, trader, community and congregation leader—liked to read and write, kept detailed business records and daybooks, and enjoyed making lists as a way of reviewing his life. Brown uses the collection of Lane family documents to exemplify life in a particular time and place, and in turn uses historical sources to expand upon the details in Lane’s writings. The book is not a biography moving chronologically through Lane’s life, introducing us to the personalities of his neighbors or describing family events as they occur. Rather, we get a sense of the man and his interactions with his community, the needs of a family and how those needs were met, and the daily activities entailed in various occupations. On every page author Brown defines, explains, and illuminates.

The book is divided into five main parts: an introduction titled “A New Hampshire Man and His Place in the World,” and four chapters, “Mastering a Trade,” “Shaping Community,” “Exchanging Commodities,” and “Building Continuity.” Nearly every two-page spread includes at least one illustration, e.g., maps, contemporary illustrations or newspaper articles, documents, photos of extant items contemporary to Lane (or belonging to the family), pages from Lane’s own papers, and tables of land measure and currency conversion.

I thoroughly enjoyed every page of this book. I learned more about colonial New England agriculture and animal husbandry; about bartering and keeping track of who owed whom what when money didn’t exchange hands; about surveying tricky bits of land, the opening of new townships, and deeds and their dower thirds and the fraction of a house that a widow could end up with—and much much more. I had some knowledge of many of the topics in the book, but Brown invariably taught me more.

The book itself is beautifully designed and laid out. Honestly, I don’t usually notice these things—I’m all about the words and the pictures, and the heck with aesthetics. The type here is clean and sharp and clear; a scholar’s margin is sometimes used for small illustrations and captions, but otherwise available to cretins like me who insist on creating a penciled dialogue with a book. Citations and comments are in endnotes at the back of the book; ordinarily I prefer footnotes, but in this case I think that they would detract from the beauty of the page and so endnotes were in fact the better way to go. The work is very well sourced, and I marked a good number of citations with “read!”— to learn more about colonial New England history. The index seems well done, although I penciled in a few additional entries of my own. I was happy to find that a few blank pages follow the index— I always appreciate these for writing additional notes!

Anyone interested in eighteenth-century America will appreciate and enjoy this book—it’s a must-read. Thank you to Jerald E. Brown and Donna-Bell Garvin, for both illustrating daily life of two hundred years ago and providing a wonderful example of a scholarly yet accessible work.

¹ Jerald E. Brown and Donna-Belle Garvin, The Years of the Life of Samuel Lane, 1718-1806: A New Hampshire Man and His World (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2000). The book is a condensed version of Brown's dissertation; it is edited and introduced by Garvin.

Learning Scrivener

I mentioned earlier this year that I would be taking an online course to better learn the ins and outs and bells and whistles of Scrivener^⁠1. Its makers at Literature & Latte describe Scrivener as “a powerful content-generation tool”; users refer to it as a word-processing program, as project management software, and  as “my favorite writing tool^⁠2.” While Scrivener’s click-here and drag-there interface makes the process of writing, brainstorming, and tinkering the text much easier—so much easier that you want to weep with happiness—than working in a traditional and more linear word processor, there are just soooo many options available that it’s easy to lose track of how to color-code cards on the corkboard or make a floating reference panel appear. I wanted to play with the toys, er… use the tools, without having to go on a darned treasure hunt to find them first.
 

Gwen Hernandez’s Scrivener for Mac^⁠3 course met my needs perfectly.

The course consisted of four weeks of lessons, posted five days a week. Color screenshots illustrated anything that might be unclear or tricky to figure out from explanation alone, or gave us a reference point to which we could compare our own results at the end of a lesson’s instructions. Each lesson finished with a homework assignment, and I thought Gwen did a good job with those. They were each brief, but left scope for stretching and trying out the trick of the day on our own work after practicing on the course material. Gwen was clearly interested in having us practice what we’d learned rather than testing us on how well we remembered where to access what—the assignment instructions frequently included a parenthetical hint on which item we needed to find under which drop-down menu. (Thank you for that, Gwen!)

Students were subscribed to a discussion board where Gwen cheerfully and thoroughly answered questions, and where students could exchange ideas and ask each other questions. The discussion board remained open for one week after lessons ended, so that those who were catching up or those who simply wanted to keep practicing still had a place to get answers from Gwen.

Gwen had us set up a little mock writing project for the course so that everyone was trying the exact same thing; it made it easier for her, too, when one of us had a question, because she knew where we had started and what results we should have gotten. (And if any of us messed up our project too badly, she'd give us a copy of whatever form it was supposed to be for that day, so that we didn't lose time trying to fix things just to get going again.)

I spent an hour or two a day working my way through the lesson and doing the homework. Often I was a day or two behind, and judging from posts in the discussion board, that was a common occurrence, but the course is well-designed to allow for that. Some students clearly spent more time than I did on the lessons, applied the day’s new knowledge to projects of their own, tested variations of what we’d learned, and came to the discussion board with thoughtful questions (frequently with screenshots of what they’d tried).

Different people learn in different ways. Some folks coming to Scrivener will explore and play and master it well. Others will read the tutorial or manual or one of the commercially available books and watch the videos and read the blog posts and do just fine from there. But for those who need or would simply enjoy a systematic and comprehensive tour, Gwen’s course is IT. And the price is totally reasonable. Literature & Latte even offers a 30 day free trial of Scrivener, meaning a person can try it out thoroughly without the cost of the software, while taking this course. (Just to be clear: it’s the software that has the free trial; you’d still have to pay for Gwen’s course.)

So, bravo to Gwen Hernandez for designing an excellent online course for a wonderful piece of software! I think just about any writer would enjoy using Scrivener, and I look forward to more genealogists integrating it into their research and writing processes and then starting conversations about how they’re using it.

¹ http://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php

² http://www.copylicious.com/2012/02/my-favorite-writing-tool-ever-how-it-makes-me-a-productive-member-of-society/

³ Gwen also offers a Scrivener for Windows course; see http://gwenhernandez.com/scrivener-online-classes/ for both courses. Gwen is also the author of Scrivener for Dummies.